Dissociation Curve Equation

Where is the signal produced for any time Where is the signal at the start of the dissociation phase Where is the baseline as time turns to infinity Where is the dissociation rate constant

Dissociation Curve Equation isolated for


Partial derivatives

Variable heldExpression
(t)
(R_t)
(R_i)
(R_a)

Domain requirement: and to keep the logarithm defined.


Mapping Tong’s two “error‑propagation paths” onto the dissociation‑rate constant

Tong Ye Wang splits accuracy analysis of into (i) fully correlated systematic biases and (ii) fully uncorrelated (independent) uncertainties, letting each path produce a compact formula that shows which experimental terms dominate.
Below the same logic is applied to

with the four underlying variables

symbolnaturehow obtained
instantaneous responseexperimental data point
long‑time baselinenonlinear fit
initial amplitudenonlinear fit
elapsed dissociation timeinstrument clock

1 · Fully correlated (strongly coupled) systematic biases

Exactly as Tong’s eq 11 → 12 step, set all biases to the same‑sign source and sum differentials:

Combining like terms:

Divide by the fitted value to expose the relative accuracy term:

The prefactor (a pure number set by your chosen time point) plays the same role as Tong’s “” in his correlated expression; it amplifies or damps how baseline/amplitude bias reaches .

Practical reading

  • Late times (small ): the first bracket explodes—baseline mis‑estimation dominates.
  • Early times: amplitude bias rules.
  • Timing bias matters only for very fast dissociation (large ).

Use worst‑case estimates for each to quote an accuracy window:


2 · Fully uncorrelated (independent) uncertainties

Mirroring Tong’s switch to a root‑sum‑of‑squares rule (eq 13 → 14), propagate variances:

and the relative precision becomes

The three square‑root terms parallel Tong’s “” constants: two depend only on baseline‑to‑amplitude variance, the third folds in the (usually tiny) clock jitter.

Practical reading

  • Identify which variance term dominates equation (3); that is your precision limit.
  • Combine with the correlated accuracy bound if both bias and random noise exist:

How to use these two paths in practice

StepCorrelated path (Eq 1–2)Uncorrelated path (Eq 3–4)
1. Gather inputsRealistic worst‑case signs for each systematic bias (e.g. sensor drift, offset in global fit, clock lag).Standard deviations from replicate traces or fit covariance matrix.
2. Compute influencePlug into Eq (1) and sum.Plug variances into Eq (3) and take square root.
3. ReportAccuracy window: .Precision (repeatability): (choose for 95 %).
4. Improve assayExtend dissociation to sharpen ; multi‑cycle global fitting to tighten ; verify clock calibration.Increase replicate count; average adjacent data points; refine weighting in nonlinear regression.

Using Tong’s two‑path mindset ensures every you publish carries both a bias‑aware accuracy limit and a statistically rigorous precision, letting downstream modelers judge fitness for purpose just as Tong advocates for equilibrium .